Sica 5 NR 1.5 PL

5" · 8 Ω · 130 W · 90 dB · datasheet ↗

Thiele-Small parameters

Nominal size	5"
Impedance	8 Ω
Fs	61 Hz
Qts	0.35
Qes	0.39
Qms	4.1
Vas	7.4 L
Sd	78.5 cm²
Xmax	3.5 mm
Re	5.6 Ω
Bl	6.65 T·m
Mms	8 g
Pe	130 W
Sensitivity	90 dB

Alignment hint

EBP	156 · ported
Sealed Vb (Qtc ≈ 0.71)	≈ 2.4 L

EBP > 100: favours a ported (bass-reflex) alignment.

Rules of thumb from T/S parameters only. Verify against a real simulation before cutting wood.

Substitute candidates

Driver	Fs (Hz)	Qts	Vas (L)	Xmax (mm)	Sens (dB)	Fit	Notes	Compare
Sica 5 F 1.5 CP	61 =	0.3 -0.05	6.8 -0.6	3.5 =	90.3 +0.3	close	100 W vs 130 W: lower power handling	+
Faital PRO 5FE100	65 +4	0.33 -0.02	6.1 -1.3	5.2 +1.7	87 -3	usable	4 Ω vs 8 Ω: amp load changes · 80 W vs 130 W: lower power handling	+
Beyma 5P200Fe	72 +11	0.33 -0.02	5.7 -1.7	5.7 +2.2	92 +2	usable		+
Faital PRO 5FE120	65 +4	0.38 +0.03	5 -2.4	5.2 +1.7	88 -2	usable	4 Ω vs 8 Ω: amp load changes · 80 W vs 130 W: lower power handling	+
B&C 5FG44	63 +2	0.27 -0.08	6.3 -1.1	3 -0.5	92 +2	usable	100 W vs 130 W: lower power handling · Xmax 3 mm < 3.5 mm: lower excursion-limited SPL	+
B&C 5FG44	70 +9	0.39 +0.04	5.1 -2.3	3 -0.5	90 =	usable	16 Ω vs 8 Ω: amp load changes · 100 W vs 130 W: lower power handling · Xmax 3 mm < 3.5 mm: lower excursion-limited SPL	+
Faital PRO 5FE120	65 +4	0.51 +0.16	6.6 -0.8	5.25 +1.75	89 -1	usable	16 Ω vs 8 Ω: amp load changes · 80 W vs 130 W: lower power handling	+
Beyma 5"MP60/N	63 +2	0.46 +0.11	5.8 -1.6	5.5 +2	88 -2	usable	50 W vs 130 W: lower power handling	+
Faital PRO 5FE100	65 +4	0.45 +0.1	5.7 -1.7	5.25 +1.75	88 -2	usable	80 W vs 130 W: lower power handling	+
Faital PRO 5FE105	65 +4	0.45 +0.1	5.7 -1.7	5.25 +1.75	88 -2	usable	80 W vs 130 W: lower power handling	+

Compare the closest 3 against the 5 NR 1.5 PL →

Ranked on parameter similarity only (Qts, Fs, Vas, Xmax, sensitivity). Same nominal size required. A hint, not a simulation, model the swap before cutting or buying.

Used in enclosures (0)

No enclosure in the catalog uses this driver yet.