RCF L 10P15K

10" · 8 Ω · 200 W · 94.1 dB · datasheet ↗

Thiele-Small parameters

Nominal size	10"
Impedance	8 Ω
Fs	83 Hz
Qts	0.718
Qes	0.79
Qms	7.9
Vas	19 L
Sd	360 cm²
Xmax	1 mm
Re	6.8 Ω
Bl	12.6 T·m
Mms	35.2 g
Pe	200 W
Sensitivity	94.1 dB

Alignment hint

EBP	105 · ported
Sealed Vb (Qtc ≈ 0.71)	Qts too high

EBP > 100: favours a ported (bass-reflex) alignment.

Rules of thumb from T/S parameters only. Verify against a real simulation before cutting wood.

Substitute candidates

Driver	Fs (Hz)	Qts	Vas (L)	Xmax (mm)	Sens (dB)	Fit	Notes	Compare
JB Systems PWX10-200	85 +2	0.74 +0.02	16 -3	2.4 +1.4	93.3 -0.8	close		+
Monacor SP-10A/250NEO	80 -3	0.635 -0.08	19 =	3 +2	95.1 +1	close		+
P.Audio HP-10T	70 -13	0.72 =	21.46 +2.46	1 =	90.4 -3.7	usable		+
B&C 10 CLX 64	70 -13	0.627 -0.09	21 +2	2.3 +1.3	93.8 -0.3	usable	70 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+
Audax PR240T0	90 +7	0.629 -0.09	20.6 +1.6	1.8 +0.8	98.6 +4.5	usable	4 Ω vs 8 Ω: amp load changes · 80 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+
Selenium 10PW3	73 -10	0.654 -0.06	29 +10	1.3 +0.3	94.9 +0.8	usable	150 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+
Celestion TF 1015	85 +2	1.049 +0.33	21 +2	1.4 +0.4	92.9 -1.2	usable	70 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+
Ciare PW255	78 -5	0.862 +0.14	26 +7	2.9 +1.9	93.8 -0.3	usable	150 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+
Celestion K10-70	80 -3	0.672 -0.05	31 +12	2.2 +1.2	95.9 +1.8	usable	70 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+
Audax HT240T0	80 -3	0.657 -0.06	34.3 +15.3	1.5 +0.5	95.6 +1.5	usable	80 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+

Compare the closest 3 against the L 10P15K →

Ranked on parameter similarity only (Qts, Fs, Vas, Xmax, sensitivity). Same nominal size required. A hint, not a simulation, model the swap before cutting or buying.

Used in enclosures (0)

No enclosure in the catalog uses this driver yet.