Focal 10C 012DB

10" · 8 Ω · 120 W · 93.6 dB · datasheet ↗

Thiele-Small parameters

Nominal size	10"
Impedance	8 Ω
Fs	26.3 Hz
Qts	0.247
Qes	0.258
Qms	5.771
Vas	135 L
Sd	343 cm²
Xmax	2.5 mm
Re	5.25 Ω
Bl	12.3 T·m
Mms	44.7 g
Pe	120 W
Sensitivity	93.6 dB

Alignment hint

EBP	102 · ported
Sealed Vb (Qtc ≈ 0.71)	≈ 18.8 L

EBP > 100: favours a ported (bass-reflex) alignment.

Rules of thumb from T/S parameters only. Verify against a real simulation before cutting wood.

Substitute candidates

Driver	Fs (Hz)	Qts	Vas (L)	Xmax (mm)	Sens (dB)	Fit	Notes	Compare
Focal 10C 012-DB	26.3 =	0.238 -0.01	134.7 -0.3	2.5 =	93.8 +0.2	close		+
Audiotechnology FLEXUNITS 10 A 77 25 10	25 -1.3	0.26 +0.01	140 +5	4.3 +1.8	90.6 -3	close		+
Audiotechnology FLEXUNIT 10A772510	25 -1.3	0.258 +0.01	140 +5	8.6 +6.1	92.5 -1.1	close		+
Mercuriale HTR 276 G0	27 +0.7	0.255 +0.01	105 -30	3 +0.5	91.6 -2	close		+
Audax HD24S45TSM-C-2CA14	27 +0.7	0.258 +0.01	178 +43	4 +1.5	94 +0.4	close	60 W vs 120 W: lower power handling	+
Audax PR240Z2	25 -1.3	0.261 +0.01	112 -23	5 +2.5	94.1 +0.5	close	4 Ω vs 8 Ω: amp load changes	+
Audax HIF24HSMC-4CA12 v2	27 +0.7	0.243 =	179.6 +44.6	5 +2.5	94 +0.4	close	40 W vs 120 W: lower power handling	+
ATC SB75-234 LC	26 -0.3	0.224 -0.02	120 -15	5 +2.5	91.8 -1.8	close	75 W vs 120 W: lower power handling	+
SEAS 25F-EWX 8	26 -0.3	0.226 -0.02	175 +40	4 +1.5	94.5 +0.9	usable	60 W vs 120 W: lower power handling	+
Vifa M25W0-49-08	25 -1.3	0.286 +0.04	164 +29	3 +0.5	92.6 -1	usable	80 W vs 120 W: lower power handling	+

Compare the closest 3 against the 10C 012DB →

Ranked on parameter similarity only (Qts, Fs, Vas, Xmax, sensitivity). Same nominal size required. A hint, not a simulation, model the swap before cutting or buying.

Used in enclosures (0)

No enclosure in the catalog uses this driver yet.