Celestion K12T-200

12" · 8 Ω · 200 W · 98.4 dB · datasheet ↗

Thiele-Small parameters

Nominal size	12"
Impedance	8 Ω
Fs	61.8 Hz
Qts	0.514
Qes	0.55
Qms	7.887
Vas	71.7 L
Sd	530 cm²
Xmax	1.5 mm
Re	5.65 Ω
Bl	12.1 T·m
Mms	36.4 g
Pe	200 W
Sensitivity	98.4 dB

Alignment hint

EBP	112 · ported
Sealed Vb (Qtc ≈ 0.71)	≈ 80.3 L

EBP > 100: favours a ported (bass-reflex) alignment.

Rules of thumb from T/S parameters only. Verify against a real simulation before cutting wood.

Substitute candidates

Driver	Fs (Hz)	Qts	Vas (L)	Xmax (mm)	Sens (dB)	Fit	Notes	Compare
SICA 12 C 2 CP	63 +1.2	0.509 -0.01	70 -1.7	4.2 +2.7	98 -0.4	close		+
Celestion K12H-200TC	60 -1.8	0.517 =	60.3 -11.4	2 +0.5	97 -1.4	close		+
Philips AD12100 vp N°3	55.3 -6.5	0.519 +0.01	78.2 +6.5	3 +1.5	98.6 +0.2	close	4 Ω vs 8 Ω: amp load changes · 100 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+
B&C 12 NCX	59 -2.8	0.51 =	64 -7.7	3 +1.5	96.9 -1.5	close		+
Celestion TRUVOX 1225	63 +1.2	0.5 -0.01	54.5 -17.2	2.5 +1	97.9 -0.5	close		+
JBL MI-12	65 +3.2	0.459 -0.05	76.5 +4.8	3.1 +1.6	99.1 +0.7	close	150 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+
RCF L 12/565	55 -6.8	0.497 -0.02	75 +3.3	3.8 +2.3	97.3 -1.1	close	100 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+
Eminence DELTA 12B	58 -3.8	0.48 -0.03	87 +15.3	2.7 +1.2	98.3 -0.1	close	16 Ω vs 8 Ω: amp load changes	+
Monacor SP-12/100PA v3	56.4 -5.4	0.491 -0.02	66.7 -5	3 +1.5	96.5 -1.9	close	100 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+
Philips AD12100 vp N°2	54.2 -7.6	0.505 -0.01	84.4 +12.7	3 +1.5	98.8 +0.4	close	4 Ω vs 8 Ω: amp load changes · 100 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+

Compare the closest 3 against the K12T-200 →

Ranked on parameter similarity only (Qts, Fs, Vas, Xmax, sensitivity). Same nominal size required. A hint, not a simulation, model the swap before cutting or buying.

Used in enclosures (0)

No enclosure in the catalog uses this driver yet.