Celestion K12H-100TC

12" · 8 Ω · 200 W · 98 dB · datasheet ↗

Thiele-Small parameters

Nominal size	12"
Impedance	8 Ω
Fs	67.5 Hz
Qts	0.524
Qes	0.581
Qms	5.381
Vas	50.7 L
Sd	530.9 cm²
Xmax	1 mm
Re	5.43 Ω
Bl	13.1 T·m
Mms	43.3 g
Pe	200 W
Sensitivity	98 dB

Alignment hint

EBP	116 · ported
Sealed Vb (Qtc ≈ 0.71)	≈ 61.8 L

EBP > 100: favours a ported (bass-reflex) alignment.

Rules of thumb from T/S parameters only. Verify against a real simulation before cutting wood.

Substitute candidates

Driver	Fs (Hz)	Qts	Vas (L)	Xmax (mm)	Sens (dB)	Fit	Notes	Compare
Jensen 12 TORNADO CLASSIC 100	72 +4.5	0.52 =	55.9 +5.2	1 =	98.5 +0.5	close	100 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+
Jensen JN12-100TR	72.4 +4.9	0.602 +0.08	48.7 -2	1 =	97.3 -0.7	close	100 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+
Jensen JN12-100TR 8	72.4 +4.9	0.608 +0.08	48.7 -2	1 =	97.2 -0.8	close	100 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+
Celestion TRUVOX 1225	63 -4.5	0.5 -0.02	54.5 +3.8	2.5 +1.5	97.9 -0.1	close		+
Celestion TF 1225	63 -4.5	0.5 -0.02	54.5 +3.8	3.5 +2.5	97.9 -0.1	close		+
Beyma 12GU	70 +2.5	0.475 -0.05	60 +9.3	2 +1	98.3 +0.3	close	80 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+
Celestion TF 1218TC v2010	74.1 +6.6	0.455 -0.07	48.1 -2.6	1.5 +0.5	99.2 +1.2	usable	100 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+
Celestion K12H-200TC	60 -7.5	0.517 -0.01	60.3 +9.6	2 +1	97 -1	usable		+
Eminence CV 75B	80 +12.5	0.479 -0.05	56.2 +5.5	1.2 +0.2	97.2 -0.8	usable	16 Ω vs 8 Ω: amp load changes · 75 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+
RCF L 12/565K	63 -4.5	0.56 +0.04	57 +6.3	2.9 +1.9	97.3 -0.7	usable	100 W vs 200 W: lower power handling	+

Compare the closest 3 against the K12H-100TC →

Ranked on parameter similarity only (Qts, Fs, Vas, Xmax, sensitivity). Same nominal size required. A hint, not a simulation, model the swap before cutting or buying.

Used in enclosures (0)

No enclosure in the catalog uses this driver yet.